Home News Forum Articles
  Welcome back Join CF
You are here You are here: Home | Forum | Static IPs, Routed Subnets, GRE tunnels, poor performance and "The Fix"

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most of the discussions, articles and other free features. By joining our Virgin Media community you will have full access to all discussions, be able to view and post threads, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own images/photos, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please join our community today.


Welcome to Cable Forum
Go Back   Cable Forum > Virgin Media Services > Virgin Media Internet Service

Static IPs, Routed Subnets, GRE tunnels, poor performance and "The Fix"
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-08-2017, 17:25   #1
alifen
Inactive
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 3
alifen is an unknown quantity at this point
Static IPs, Routed Subnets, GRE tunnels, poor performance and "The Fix"

Hello all,

I have read almost every thread I can find on this topic and haven't yet been able to piece together the answers to my questions. Please don't direct me to the search function -- I have been hammering it for a good few hours!

I have tried to lay out all my questions below in the hope someone might be able to help easily.

[Q1] I understand that in the past the 50 Mb/s service with a static IP block was delivered via a routed subnet. Am I correct in interpreting this to mean the following two things are true?

(a) There was no GRE tunnel.
(b) The modem was assigned a dynamic IP and a subnet was routed to it by virtue of a routing table entry in the VM network, i.e. just as the BT Infinity service works.



[Q2] There is lots of documented examples of poor performance on the 350 Mb/s service with a static IP block (this is what I, as of last week, am on). There is also lots of the the "fix" coming in August or early September. Is the fix expected to be:

(a) Replacement of GRE tunnels with routed subnets that work as above.
(b) A firmware fix that keeps GRE tunnels, but improves packet handling so to alleviate the problems.
(c) Something else.



[Q3] What relation is the Puma 6 fix to the 350 Mb/s service with static IPs? My sense is 'none', but I can't find that stated explicitly and some people seem to be be conflating the issues.



Thanks in advance to anyone that can help!
alifen is offline   Reply With Quote
Advertisement
Old 01-08-2017, 20:26   #2
vm_tech
cf.addict
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 336
vm_tech is a name known to allvm_tech is a name known to allvm_tech is a name known to allvm_tech is a name known to allvm_tech is a name known to allvm_tech is a name known to allvm_tech is a name known to allvm_tech is a name known to all
Re: Static IPs, Routed Subnets, GRE tunnels, poor performance and "The Fix"

The 50mb service using the sh1 did have a routed subnet. It wasn't a GRE tunnel but I believe it was L2TP, so a different protocol.

I'm told the fix is due in August. But as with anything this can change. What the fix may or may not involve, I don't particularly want to talk about as I'm not sure what I can and can't say.

Correct, Puma6 and static IP issues are completely unrelated. I don't think the puma6 issue is a massive deal, I've certainly not had any customers mention it to me
vm_tech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2017, 22:22   #3
ccarmock
cf.geek
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 804
ccarmock has entered a golden reputation eraccarmock has entered a golden reputation eraccarmock has entered a golden reputation eraccarmock has entered a golden reputation eraccarmock has entered a golden reputation eraccarmock has entered a golden reputation eraccarmock has entered a golden reputation eraccarmock has entered a golden reputation eraccarmock has entered a golden reputation eraccarmock has entered a golden reputation eraccarmock has entered a golden reputation era
Re: Static IPs, Routed Subnets, GRE tunnels, poor performance and "The Fix"

The older (no longer on sale) 50 Mb/s routed subnet option was delivered on a SuperHub1 with business firmware. As vm_tech says the tunnel was indeed an L2TP tunnel not GRE. The SH1 was assigned a further IP address via DHCP but from a 'static pool' (!) that acted as the L2TP tunnel endpoint. The same thing happens with the Hitron based service, except the tunnel is a GRE tunnel.

Several people have indeed reported an issue with the static IP address service, which seems to affect some, but not all customers.

I had reason to talk to tech support last week due to a performance issue, but that was related to an SNR area fault not fragmentation. I did enquire about the 'fix' and was told there is a target date of 19th August to roll out that fix. Of course that could change.

What I was told by a product manager was that the fix was mainly with core infrastructure, though I do know people have mentioned a firmware update for the Hitron as well.

The Hitron does use a PUMA 6 chipset. The latency / jitter issues seem to not affect it in the same way as the Sh3. There was a firmware update, but also the GRE tunnel appears to mask some of the effects of this as well, so whether the firmware addressed the issue or the GRE tunnel masks it I am not sure. However I can confirm I now have the full 24 downstreams and have a clean ThinkBroadband graph.
ccarmock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2017, 12:31   #4
alifen
Inactive
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 3
alifen is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Static IPs, Routed Subnets, GRE tunnels, poor performance and "The Fix"

Thanks for all your input guys -- really helps.

The issue for me is packet fragmentation. I realise a full 1500 byte MTU (as is possible on Infinity with baby jumbos) might be a forlorn hope, but getting to 1492 to have some parity with most PPPoE implementations would be good.

vm_tech -- whilst I know what you can say is limited, can you pass any comment on if the fix will see an increase in MTU?

There is a chap in this thread that said Virgin has asked if they could push new firmware to him, with a target date of the 2nd of August (today) to help with the fragmentation issue.

I am hopeful that changes to edge devices means we are more likely to see an MTU increase then if the fix was only in the core network.
alifen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2017, 15:28   #5
pcfarrar
Inactive
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 17
pcfarrar is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Static IPs, Routed Subnets, GRE tunnels, poor performance and "The Fix"

It's september now and Voom 350 is still rubbish. Just tested two of our connections and they are both running at less than 10 Mbps up and down.
pcfarrar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2017, 17:19   #6
kalleh
cf.addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 108
kalleh is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Static IPs, Routed Subnets, GRE tunnels, poor performance and "The Fix"

I had it installed with dynamic first and had support switch it to the static IP only to switch it back to dynamic because the performance was that much different.

from 350 to a variable 70 then back to 350.
kalleh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2017, 19:33   #7
pcfarrar
Inactive
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 17
pcfarrar is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Static IPs, Routed Subnets, GRE tunnels, poor performance and "The Fix"

Quote:
Originally Posted by kalleh View Post
I had it installed with dynamic first and had support switch it to the static IP only to switch it back to dynamic because the performance was that much different.

from 350 to a variable 70 then back to 350.
Dynamic isn't an option for me unfortunately, the single static IP doesn't seem to be as bad, but the performance of the 5 IP's is terrible.
pcfarrar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2017, 20:38   #8
thedotlair
cf.member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 20
thedotlair is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Static IPs, Routed Subnets, GRE tunnels, poor performance and "The Fix"

Experienced exactly the same thing recently after signing up to Voom 3 with 5 statics. Inconsistent speeds, packet fragmentation (even when pushing the MTU right down to under 1300), latency all over the place etc.

Phoned support, like everybody else here, who immediately acknowledged it and stated testing was still underway on "the fix" which is awaiting sign off to move all customers over.

I'm now on Dynamic with a view to move back to 5 Statics when they implement the fix .. but that could be "anytime between now and Xmas" from the support tech assigned to my ticket
thedotlair is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2017, 14:19   #9
ccarmock
cf.geek
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 804
ccarmock has entered a golden reputation eraccarmock has entered a golden reputation eraccarmock has entered a golden reputation eraccarmock has entered a golden reputation eraccarmock has entered a golden reputation eraccarmock has entered a golden reputation eraccarmock has entered a golden reputation eraccarmock has entered a golden reputation eraccarmock has entered a golden reputation eraccarmock has entered a golden reputation eraccarmock has entered a golden reputation era
Re: Static IPs, Routed Subnets, GRE tunnels, poor performance and "The Fix"

I am working directly with a senior tech at VM on testing at the moment.
There is an outage planned later this month which you might have got an email about which is paving the way for the fix, but isn't the fix in itself.
ccarmock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2017, 14:24   #10
thedotlair
cf.member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 20
thedotlair is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Static IPs, Routed Subnets, GRE tunnels, poor performance and "The Fix"

No, not received any kind of email so far over any outages.

Do they have to be signed up to or are you automatically enrolled to receive them?
thedotlair is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2017, 14:33   #11
ccarmock
cf.geek
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 804
ccarmock has entered a golden reputation eraccarmock has entered a golden reputation eraccarmock has entered a golden reputation eraccarmock has entered a golden reputation eraccarmock has entered a golden reputation eraccarmock has entered a golden reputation eraccarmock has entered a golden reputation eraccarmock has entered a golden reputation eraccarmock has entered a golden reputation eraccarmock has entered a golden reputation eraccarmock has entered a golden reputation era
Re: Static IPs, Routed Subnets, GRE tunnels, poor performance and "The Fix"

It's possible they are scheduling the work depending on which area within VM your GRE tunnels terminates.

I have a note to say I will have service interruption between midnight & 6amon 13th September. This was in an email received on Thursday.

I checked with my VM contact and it is related to the performance issue and paves the way for the fix.

I automatically receive these notices when a change could affect my service.
ccarmock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2017, 18:54   #12
Ignitionnet
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Age: 45
Posts: 13,996
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Static IPs, Routed Subnets, GRE tunnels, poor performance and "The Fix"

Mr Carmock, would you be open to discussing this with me further, please?
Ignitionnet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2017, 20:20   #13
thedotlair
cf.member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 20
thedotlair is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Static IPs, Routed Subnets, GRE tunnels, poor performance and "The Fix"

Thanks Carmock Have asked the person who is my single contact on the contract to enquire about automataed emails which could affect my service as well.

Good to know that you're also working with them on it! Fingers crossed it's before Xmas
thedotlair is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2017, 21:58   #14
ccarmock
cf.geek
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 804
ccarmock has entered a golden reputation eraccarmock has entered a golden reputation eraccarmock has entered a golden reputation eraccarmock has entered a golden reputation eraccarmock has entered a golden reputation eraccarmock has entered a golden reputation eraccarmock has entered a golden reputation eraccarmock has entered a golden reputation eraccarmock has entered a golden reputation eraccarmock has entered a golden reputation eraccarmock has entered a golden reputation era
Re: Static IPs, Routed Subnets, GRE tunnels, poor performance and "The Fix"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ignitionnet View Post
Mr Carmock, would you be open to discussing this with me further, please?
Sure - no problem - will drop you a PM here.
ccarmock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2017, 22:34   #15
dragon
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,898
dragon has reached the bronze age
dragon has reached the bronze agedragon has reached the bronze agedragon has reached the bronze agedragon has reached the bronze agedragon has reached the bronze agedragon has reached the bronze agedragon has reached the bronze agedragon has reached the bronze agedragon has reached the bronze agedragon has reached the bronze age
Re: Static IPs, Routed Subnets, GRE tunnels, poor performance and "The Fix"

Quote:
Originally Posted by ccarmock View Post
The Hitron does use a PUMA 6 chipset. The latency / jitter issues seem to not affect it in the same way as the Sh3. There was a firmware update, but also the GRE tunnel appears to mask some of the effects of this as well, so whether the firmware addressed the issue or the GRE tunnel masks it I am not sure. However I can confirm I now have the full 24 downstreams and have a clean ThinkBroadband graph.
That's probably the GRE, I have an L2TP tunnel via the SH3 and notice that IP has usually has less latency on it than my native VM IP, presumably something to do with the way the packet accelerator in the cable modem side handles things, maybe Gre is only a single flow as far as it's concerned.
dragon is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 23:59.


Server: osmium.zmnt.uk
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.