Why are we still bothering with SD?
12-08-2013, 14:38
|
#31
|
Guest
Location: Luton
Services: Big Kahuna, Phone XL, Boxnation
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Why are we still bothering with SD?
Quote:
Originally Posted by dilligaf1701
I only have HD for the wife who will go out of her way to watch it, I don't see the point in it myself so don't record / watch HD stuff.
I can see a time when it'll all be HD but I'm in no hurry for it to happen.
|
A lady with vision and is she the Hotel Inspector to boot
|
|
|
12-08-2013, 14:44
|
#32
|
R.I.P.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Near Sandy Heath transmitter
Services: BT
Posts: 19,325
|
Re: Why are we still bothering with SD?
Quote:
Originally Posted by mhatter67
A lady with vision and is she the Hotel Inspector to boot
|
It'd be nice, but my missus is MUCH better looking
|
|
|
12-08-2013, 14:51
|
#33
|
Guest
Location: Luton
Services: Big Kahuna, Phone XL, Boxnation
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Why are we still bothering with SD?
Quote:
Originally Posted by dilligaf1701
It'd be nice, but my missus is MUCH better looking
|
|
|
|
12-08-2013, 15:25
|
#34
|
-
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Somewhere
Services: Virgin for TV and Internet, BT for phone
Posts: 26,536
|
Re: Why are we still bothering with SD?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Topgun
Well, the title says it all really, what's the point? Surely at some time in the future, SD will disappear altogether leaving us just with the HD channels. As far as I am concerned it might as well happen sooner rather than later! It would presumably free up a load of bandwidth and reduce costs, also it would end the rediculous channel numbering system we have at present where the HD variant of a channel may be hundreds of channels away from its SD version.
I appreciate that some people would have to upgrade their TVs, but have you seen the prices of basic HD TVs these days, they're dirt cheap!
I honestly can't see a downside to this suggestion, but appreciate that others may have a different point of view and if so would be interested to hear it.
|
Actually, no. Every channel moving to HD only would not save bandwidth. It would actually use a lot more. This is why we are *never* likely to get a situation where SD is switched off entirely. There is also the problem for current SD channels of cost. While you or I might only have to upgrade 1 TV at the cost of £100 or £200, a TV company would have to look at upgrading all it's cameras, recorders, editing systems and playback systems. Not to mention the networking and power systems of it's buildings, as the new equipment is likely to use a lot more power. This is actually the reason the BBC moved out of Television centre: It would have cost too much to fully upgrade TC for HD work. In short, you or I would be looking at a couple of hundred pounds for a cheap set. A TV company (even a small one) could be looking at several million pounds of expenditure to upgrade their buildings and equipment.
Personally, I don't think we will get a situation where the current channels with both HD and SD variants will switch the SD variants off. Purely because while HDTVs are dirt cheap these days, they are still out of reach for some people. Not everyone can afford to throw out a perfectly good SD set purely because the world has gone HD, even if new HD sets are around the £100 mark.
---------- Post added at 15:25 ---------- Previous post was at 15:07 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Topgun
Well, some interesting points there. I have to say I don't quite understand the compensation argument, no-one suggested that Kodak should compensate anyone who owned an old camera when they said they weren't going to make film any more. No-one suggested that the makers of HD DVD devices should pay compensation to owners when they lost out to Blu Ray in the format wars and loads of other examples of similar that have occurred over the years!
|
Spiderplant is, I think, looking at things from Virgin's point of view. Because we rent the STBs from Virgin, people would (rightly) expect them to provide replacement boxes for free (or at least a reasonable cost) if any of the major channels stopped SD broadcasts. I think, although I am not sure, that there may also be a legal requirement for them to do so, or at least allow the customer to terminate their contract with no penalty.
When you buy something (like a Blu Ray player or Camera), the company's responsibility toward you ends when the warranty does (and even then it's limited). When you rent something from a company, their responsibility does not end until the contract is cancelled, which may take years (or even decades).
|
|
|
12-08-2013, 22:58
|
#35
|
cf.member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 18
|
Re: Why are we still bothering with SD?
One thing that I do dislike about Virgin and HD is how the HD channels are nearly all high up in the channel numbers. It would be much better if they did what Sky did and swapped them with the SD versions at the lower numbers.
Unfortunately, they're going away from this recently, swapping the HD channels of Alibi, Watch etc with their +1 variants, bringing the +1s to lower numbers and HD channels to forgettable high numbers.
|
|
|
13-08-2013, 12:23
|
#36
|
Inactive
Join Date: Dec 2005
Services: Virgin 100 meg BB, Talk More Anytime Phone, Mix TV, V6.
Posts: 4,729
|
Re: Why are we still bothering with SD?
Quote:
Originally Posted by badoerfan
One thing that I do dislike about Virgin and HD is how the HD channels are nearly all high up in the channel numbers. .
|
That may sometimes have a hidden advantage. I remember reading a post a while back now, by someone that said that Tivo will pick the highest numbered channel to record a wishlist item from, if the same whishlist show appears at the same time on two different channels.
I can't say that I've studied this at all, but I have noticed that whishlist shows that turn up on Sky One or Living tend to pick up the HD channel and some whishlist shows that turn up on the BBC are sometimes on the BBC1 Eng and BBC2 Eng channels. It could be pure coincidence though?
|
|
|
13-08-2013, 12:43
|
#37
|
Rise above the players
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Wokingham
Services: 2 V6 boxes with 360 software, Now, ITVX, Amazon, Netflix, Lionsgate+, Apple+, Disney+, Paramount +,
Posts: 14,595
|
Re: Why are we still bothering with SD?
Quote:
Originally Posted by badoerfan
One thing that I do dislike about Virgin and HD is how the HD channels are nearly all high up in the channel numbers. It would be much better if they did what Sky did and swapped them with the SD versions at the lower numbers.
Unfortunately, they're going away from this recently, swapping the HD channels of Alibi, Watch etc with their +1 variants, bringing the +1s to lower numbers and HD channels to forgettable high numbers.
|
Maybe I'm being a bit thick here, but why are you concerned with the channel numbering system?
If you are only interested in the HD channels, then why not just select HD on the EPG when looking for the channel you want?
|
|
|
13-08-2013, 13:21
|
#38
|
cf.member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 18
|
Re: Why are we still bothering with SD?
Quote:
Originally Posted by OLD BOY
Maybe I'm being a bit thick here, but why are you concerned with the channel numbering system?
If you are only interested in the HD channels, then why not just select HD on the EPG when looking for the channel you want?
|
Because I'm not 'only interested in HD channels. Frequently I'll be flicking through the channels looking for something to watch, and find something interesting on ITV4 or Comedy Central, only to then be confronted by the 'oh god, what number is ITV4 HD? 182? 168? Somewhere around here... 175? Eventually I'll find it, but it'd be a lot less effort to have the channel lower down - who wants to watch the SD version of a channel they have in HD?
Quote:
Originally Posted by passingbat
That may sometimes have a hidden advantage. I remember reading a post a while back now, by someone that said that Tivo will pick the highest numbered channel to record a wishlist item from, if the same whishlist show appears at the same time on two different channels.
I can't say that I've studied this at all, but I have noticed that whishlist shows that turn up on Sky One or Living tend to pick up the HD channel and some whishlist shows that turn up on the BBC are sometimes on the BBC1 Eng and BBC2 Eng channels. It could be pure coincidence though?
|
I think you may be right, and that's a very good point. I do wish they could at least stay grouped together (on channels 131, 132 and 133, for example), rather than shoving the HD variant up high.
|
|
|
13-08-2013, 13:47
|
#39
|
cf.addict
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Glasgow
Services: VM L TV powered by TiVo, 30MB BB, Sky Sports, Phone L, Freeview.
Posts: 280
|
Re: Why are we still bothering with SD?
SD will undoubtedly die off. It may take another 10 years +, but it will happen. There will be few people left with non HD TVs, studios will all eventually upgrade to HD equipment as it's getting cheaper each year. It'll get to a point where having to downscale to SD causes more hassle.
People use to say that about widescreen - that as not everyone has a widescreen TV, 4:3 programmes would be around for a while yet. To a point it is, but not for much longer.
Only historical programming will remain in SD 4:3...! The future is HD 16:9 or better.
Can you imagine when UDH/4K really takes off, trying to watch SD on a 100in screen? No chance.
|
|
|
13-08-2013, 15:53
|
#40
|
Rise above the players
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Wokingham
Services: 2 V6 boxes with 360 software, Now, ITVX, Amazon, Netflix, Lionsgate+, Apple+, Disney+, Paramount +,
Posts: 14,595
|
Re: Why are we still bothering with SD?
Quote:
Originally Posted by badoerfan
Because I'm not 'only interested in HD channels. Frequently I'll be flicking through the channels looking for something to watch, and find something interesting on ITV4 or Comedy Central, only to then be confronted by the 'oh god, what number is ITV4 HD? 182? 168? Somewhere around here... 175? Eventually I'll find it, but it'd be a lot less effort to have the channel lower down - who wants to watch the SD version of a channel they have in HD?
|
So why not go straight to the HD channels to look up your programmes?
|
|
|
13-08-2013, 16:08
|
#41
|
cf.geek
Join Date: Mar 2004
Services: Tivo V6 - L TV/XL Phone /200Mb BB
Posts: 896
|
Re: Why are we still bothering with SD?
Current regional programs are still shown on SD, I am not interested in non Yorkshire based adverts whilst watching say ITV HD.
|
|
|
13-08-2013, 16:17
|
#42
|
cf.member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 51
|
Re: Why are we still bothering with SD?
Quote:
Originally Posted by OLD BOY
So why not go straight to the HD channels to look up your programmes?
|
Because then the SD-only ones won't be listed?
I read it as 'browse all channels to see what's on, but have an easy way to get to the HD version if it is an SD programme that catches your eye'.
Personally I'd like an option to hide SD versions of HD channels entirely.
|
|
|
13-08-2013, 17:01
|
#43
|
Inactive
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Surrey
Services: Virgin Cable TV (Tivo) and Freeview
Posts: 1,227
|
Re: Why are we still bothering with SD?
Still think SD will last a while yet and not everyone has the full XL package and all the possible HD channels.
|
|
|
13-08-2013, 19:21
|
#44
|
Sceptic
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,664
|
Re: Why are we still bothering with SD?
Maybe we've been spoiled but the SD picture on some channels is terrible. Watching a re-run of Man Utd v Liverpool on SS3 and the picture is shocking.
__________________
Jesus don't want me for a sunbeam, sunbeams are not made like me.
|
|
|
13-08-2013, 19:45
|
#45
|
Trollsplatter
Cable Forum Team
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: North of Watford
Services: Humane elimination of all common Internet pests
Posts: 36,959
|
Re: Why are we still bothering with SD?
IIRC that's down to bitrate rather than the picture definition. There has always been a very noticeable difference in quality between the main PSB channels like BBC1 and some of the also-rans, on satellite at least.
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:54.
|