Doctor Who : 2008 & 2009 Specials
02-01-2010, 16:23
|
#256
|
Remoaner
Cable Forum Team
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 32,245
|
Re: Doctor Who : 2008 & 2009 Specials
So did the women give Will the gun to shoot himself in the cabin or?
|
|
|
02-01-2010, 16:58
|
#257
|
[CENSORED]
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Wolverhampton
Age: 45
Services: Virginmedia - BB:250 TV:Mix TiVo v6 Phone:Talk Weekends w/anon reject
Posts: 4,217
|
Re: Doctor Who : 2008 & 2009 Specials
Quote:
Originally Posted by Delta Whiskey
Anyone for a spin off series, Mr & Mrs Smith starring Martha & Micky? (instead of Angelina & Brad).
|
I thought Martha and Mickey were to be a part of the next Torchwood team?
__________________
Help save the world from loosers
|
|
|
02-01-2010, 17:25
|
#258
|
Trollsplatter
Cable Forum Team
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: North of Watford
Services: Humane elimination of all common Internet pests
Posts: 36,987
|
Re: Doctor Who : 2008 & 2009 Specials
Quote:
Originally Posted by v0id
I thought Martha and Mickey were to be a part of the next Torchwood team?
|
That may be exactly what they were doing when they appeared last night ...
|
|
|
02-01-2010, 19:06
|
#259
|
R.I.P.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Near Sandy Heath transmitter
Services: BT
Posts: 19,325
|
Re: Doctor Who : 2008 & 2009 Specials
I just saw it and thought it was ok. A fitting end. It would have made a fitting end to the series too, ah well.
|
|
|
02-01-2010, 19:50
|
#260
|
-
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Somewhere
Services: Virgin for TV and Internet, BT for phone
Posts: 26,536
|
Re: Doctor Who : 2008 & 2009 Specials
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moldova
They never want to die and most have said something onlong similar lines over the years.
|
I believe Tom Baker has recently said he wouldn't mind coming back if asked.. Admittedly, he may be a bit old now.
|
|
|
02-01-2010, 20:57
|
#261
|
Inactive
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,375
|
Re: Doctor Who : 2008 & 2009 Specials
My first thought that the woman was the Watcher, who has a propensity to turn up when the Doctor re-generates, or even the White Guardian, but observing the Doctor's re-action when she uncovered her face, he appeared to have a familial concern about her, or at least someone to whom he felt close to. I thought that she might be his mother and the make figure (yet to be revealed) was his father. I like the idea that she might be an older Donna, taking the role of an "honorary" Timelord, due to the meta-crisis, but that would not work with the concept of the time lock. The Doctor would have been aware of her presence at the time of the war.
I most of all like the idea that it might have been Romana, from I can remember, she secured a seat in the high council and subsequently was elected President (or was that a YouTube ep?). If I am wrong, she is still in "N" space and therefore not involved at all.
|
|
|
02-01-2010, 21:33
|
#262
|
Trollsplatter
Cable Forum Team
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: North of Watford
Services: Humane elimination of all common Internet pests
Posts: 36,987
|
Re: Doctor Who : 2008 & 2009 Specials
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyboy
My first thought that the woman was the Watcher, who has a propensity to turn up when the Doctor re-generates, or even the White Guardian, but observing the Doctor's re-action when she uncovered her face, he appeared to have a familial concern about her, or at least someone to whom he felt close to. I thought that she might be his mother and the make figure (yet to be revealed) was his father. I like the idea that she might be an older Donna, taking the role of an "honorary" Timelord, due to the meta-crisis, but that would not work with the concept of the time lock. The Doctor would have been aware of her presence at the time of the war.
I most of all like the idea that it might have been Romana, from I can remember, she secured a seat in the high council and subsequently was elected President (or was that a YouTube ep?). If I am wrong, she is still in "N" space and therefore not involved at all.
|
Mark Lawson, reviewing this episode in the Grauniad, points to a number of parallels between it and Hamlet, which both David Tennant and Claire Bloom (who played the woman) have appeared in recently. Tennant of course played Hamlet. Claire Bloom played Hamlet's mother. It's quite fascinating and worth a read:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/tv-and-rad...who-regenerate
Actually, the comments beneath the article are even more of an eye-opener, there are some real nutcases touring the interwebs right now, variously whingeing about RTD 'ruining' Doctor Who (and conveniently forgetting that about 10 million people disagree), or getting very precious when non-fans like Mark Lawson dare to make definitive statements about the mystery woman's identity, when those statements contradict their own pet theories - theories that are invariably nothing more than highly convoluted FW.
I think Russell T Davies has steered a very careful and clever path through the show's backstory, using elements that suit his own storylines without being forced, droping throwaway references in for the fans to enjoy, and always keeping well clear of the arcane. For example, he likes to re-use concepts like Artron energy soaking the body of a time traveller, but not in a way that requires you to have seen and understood The Deadly Assassin or Four to Doomsday.
On the subject of Romana ... in TV canon (the only one that counts IMO) she is still in e-space, with K9 and some Tharil bloke. Acording to some original novels and audio dramas, she returned to normal space and became president of the Time Lords on Gallifrey. RTD only seemed to validate non-TV adventures as Canon if he chose deliberately to bring them into the TV realm, for example by having The Moff re-work Sally Sparrow's adventures from a Dr Who annual into Blink, or by re-telling Human Nature, which was created as a 7th Doctor original novel. Given RTD's record in this department I think it imposibly unlikely that he intended the character to be someone who is utterly obscure to fans of the new series. He wouldn't have just thrown it in there because it would have demanded too much explanation.
|
|
|
02-01-2010, 21:51
|
#263
|
cf.geek
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: great yarmouth
Services: Zen Fibre, Asus RT-AC68U
Posts: 900
|
Re: Doctor Who : 2008 & 2009 Specials
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
whingeing about RTD 'ruining' Doctor Who (and conveniently forgetting that about 10 million people disagree)
|
over 2 million people read the dailymail, despite their best efforts people keep voting for labour and the conservatives.
in my length of time here on this planet i've concluded that most people are idiots.
|
|
|
02-01-2010, 21:56
|
#264
|
Trollsplatter
Cable Forum Team
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: North of Watford
Services: Humane elimination of all common Internet pests
Posts: 36,987
|
Re: Doctor Who : 2008 & 2009 Specials
wassatyousay?
The Daily Heil has been reluctantly nuLab since the mid 1990s and has progresively turned to frothing hard right over the last 4-5 years. And it has a loyal following of 2 million because those are the same people who like to hear what it has to say. Love it or hate it, the Mail is extremely good at what it does.
Just as RTD has been extremely good at his job.
|
|
|
02-01-2010, 21:58
|
#265
|
Inactive
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,375
|
Re: Doctor Who : 2008 & 2009 Specials
Which makes me think that it could be any of the above. Parental relationships are easy to explain to the new crop of fans, but harder for fans of the Doctor for the last forty years, from what I can remember there wasn't much reference to them in the old series. The Gaurdian and Watcher would be easy to explain to new fans as well as part of canon. They were explained before and can be explained again.
|
|
|
03-01-2010, 01:27
|
#266
|
Inactive
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Portsmouth
Age: 56
Services: XL BB, XL TV, V+
Posts: 742
|
Re: Doctor Who : 2008 & 2009 Specials
i've not read the guardian link cos it's 01:25 but i thought it was his mother and the other figure with his hands over his face was his father. they were the 2 votes against the action the timelords took because they knew that what they would do would kill their son.
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 16:49.
|