Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh
But the Executive Order has to conform to the laws of the land and the Constitution, and not over-ride those - this is the basis on which the Federal Judge over-ruled it, and why it must be considered in the Courts.
Even the President has to follow the Law and the Constitution.
|
So where is the hypothetical example that would be valid. There must be be one for the grounds against the Executive Order to be remotely valid. Any basis will always affect one group than another.
If anything it is those that are opposed to the EO that are acting illegally as they keep trying to discriminate by overturning the general rule with discriminatory exceptions to the rule. It is exceptions to a general rule that are discriminatory. The general rule by definition isn't, as it is applied generally.