Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre
It could matter, for Schofield, if it turns out to be true that he has known this young man from a very early age. 12 yrs old allegedly. The accusation is that Schofield essentially groomed the young man. Now there is no accusation of any underage sexual activity, but there is certainly a power dynamic. Schofield being the person in position of power and wielding influence, enough to get this young man a job and screen tests on This Morning.
The implications being, if this was a man in his late 50’s doing this with a 16yr old girl, well ……say no more.
It’s also alleged that it is the affair with this teenager, as he would have been a few years ago, that forced Schofield to come out, of which he was lauded for being so “brave” by everyone. Even though he was a razors edge away from noncing it.
So those that claim “nope” and nothing to see here, are collegiate in the study of wilful blindness.
|
Yes, it matters if it is true and there is evidence to support but while it is just click bait tabloid dirt, it does not.
BTW, not sure "collegiate in the study of wilful blindness" really works here