Cable Forum - View Single Post

Ignitionnet · 23-09-2017, 14:30

Yeah ring 0 is old hat and ring -1 for noobs.

Think we're going to need hardware built around a secure computing framework which means a few things will change, but then those in the know have been waiting for this for a while now. Software has repeatedly proved incapable of providing anything approaching a secure computing environment. Security co-processors sitting in between software and CPU have been on the table for a while.

---------- Post added at 14:30 ---------- Previous post was at 14:21 ----------

Yes. BlueBorne. Flaws through bad implementations of an excessively complicated protocol. Moral: KISS.

23-09-2017, 14:30	#13
Ignitionnet Inactive Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire Age: 45 Posts: 13,996	Re: Windows Defender Security Centre Yeah ring 0 is old hat and ring -1 for noobs. Think we're going to need hardware built around a secure computing framework which means a few things will change, but then those in the know have been waiting for this for a while now. Software has repeatedly proved incapable of providing anything approaching a secure computing environment. Security co-processors sitting in between software and CPU have been on the table for a while. ---------- Post added at 14:30 ---------- Previous post was at 14:21 ---------- Yes. BlueBorne. Flaws through bad implementations of an excessively complicated protocol. Moral: KISS.