Quote:
Originally Posted by OLD BOY
PFI was a Labour initiative, wasn't it? They should not be allowed to dodge that truth.
Frankly I don't care whether the private or public sector run it, as long as we get better value for money, and provided that it remains free at the point of delivery.
---------- Post added at 16:39 ---------- Previous post was at 16:33 ----------
Why does anyone care so much who runs the NHS? It's a ridiculous debate, given the obvious inefficiency that we have to contend with while it remains as it is.
|
PFI was a rebranding of the Conservative PPP scheme by the Labour Party. Both are costing us dearly but with an effective two-state system, both parties will be forgiven and re-elected. In fact, the same way that you seem to gloss over the Conservative Party's PPP suggests many have already forgiven the Conservative Party.
---------- Post added at 19:08 ---------- Previous post was at 19:06 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by RizzyKing
I do love the response of "forget the past it's about the future" which of course benefits labour as they were responsible for more privatisation then the conservatives in the past and would do it again in the future because PFI fits right in with the labour philosophy of deliver now, pay later so the past is relevant because labour will repeat it. As long as there are muppets who will keep supporting labour it won't change because they just delude themselves that only the tories are a threat to the NHS.
|
What figures do you have to demonstrate your assertion?