|
Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
From the Telegraph
Quote:
But inquiries carried out by the police and the Crown Prosecution Service showed that the message, which the court heard was first published on the Infidels of Britain website, was published at a time when the jury was in its jury room where all electronic equipment is banned.
Judge Clifton said that ''having heard that the jury deny any improper behaviour'' he was ''satisfied that no juror is at fault in communicating the jury's position, either deliberately or accidentally to anyone else''.
''That means that the question of bias doesn't arise at all,'' he said.
''I have found no evidence to suggest a juror is at fault.''
''The jury have been strictly confined in their jury room during most of the period that some of these tweets manifested themselves.''
|
Also, the verdict was announced on Tuesday 8th May, and the tweet was sent by Nick Griffin Thursday 3rd May (and immediately back-tracked) - if the verdicts had been reached, what were the jury doing for the rest of the time?
__________________
There is always light.
If only we’re brave enough to see it.
If only we’re brave enough to be it.
If my post is in bold and this colour, it's a Moderator Request.
|