Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh
Just for the sake of argument, what if the 97% consensus of Climate Scientists are wrong, what's the worst that happened - we stopped polluting our planet as much as we do now, and some money was spent on providing alternate sources of power (which can only be good, as fossil fuels are needed to all the tech stuff we like, being hydrocarbon based, rather than being wasted creating electricity). If, on the other hand, they are right, we (or our children) are fairly screwed if we don't do anything about it.
|
What would be the point that skeptics would be willing to work on the assumption it is happening and it is man-made? Because no single event will ever be proof of climate change and each time we get 'freak' weather events they will be dismissed as one incident not proving anything.