View Single Post
Old 02-05-2024, 03:57   #574
RichardCoulter
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 10,141
RichardCoulter has disabled reputation
Re: Online Safety Bill

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul View Post
You didnt use forum smilies. Phone emojis wont work.

As to webcams, you just cover them with a bit of tape.
Ahhh, that explains it.

---------- Post added at 03:30 ---------- Previous post was at 03:23 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirius View Post
Considering the amount of rubbish surrounding the Online Safety Bill any fantasies could be considered and put forward. For instance the idea the Online Safety Bill would stop children from being targeted has already shown it will not work when it was disclosed that attacks have been perpetrated at UK children from Africa. It has no teeth if the attacks are from outside the country. What Orwellian fantasises will they create to cover that issue ?

---------- Post added at 03:35 ---------- Previous post was at 03:30 ----------

I'm not aware that there have been any Orwellian fantasies put forward by France or the UK. It was simply a joke.

If a country became so strict with it's citizens as to make them use a webcam to see if under 3's were watching the television (not that I think that France would do this) then covering up the webcam would probably result in a visit by the sectet police!

---------- Post added at 03:57 ---------- Previous post was at 03:35 ----------

The Online Safety Act dictates that search engines, messaging services, video sharing platforms and sites that have user generated content are required to have safeguards to protect children from extremist & terrorist content. Fines of up
18 million pounds can be levied on those who fail to do so.

Dr Moses Ashafe from Ofcom is a Principle Officer overseeing online hate and terrorism.said that they will have much more resources next year to disrupt or block services if needs be.

This programme says that websites have been given access to key phrases in order to flag up innapropriate material.

It also says that a significant number of people who post such material are neuro diverse eg autism.

I think that those who post inappropriate things on the internet as a result of neuro divergence should be offered help as opposed to being punished for it.

If not, it would be akin to charging someone with mobility problems for causing an obstruction!!


https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m001yqr8
RichardCoulter is offline   Reply With Quote