View Single Post
Old 24-01-2021, 12:59   #210
1andrew1
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 14,277
1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze
1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze
Re: Britain outside the EU

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris View Post
That’s the same “clever ploy” the banks have all been implementing since the ballots were counted. As long as you have a subsidiary registered in an EU State you avoid most of the red tape. The reality however is that actually doing that is itself an excessive burden for many businesses.

The primary opportunity here is in the fact that small EU businesses now face the same barriers to trading here. It should be easier for British businesses to sell here without competition from EU ones. And, especially where what’s being sold is cheap Chinese tat that’s already sailed halfway round the world, it’s better for the environment if it’s warehoused and sold within the UK rather than being held somewhere outside Rotterdam or Frankfurt and then sent over here on fleets of HGVs.
Isn't the bigger opportunity now for EU companies to sell in a market of 448m people without the competition from UK companies and to seize those orders from UK companies who do not find it economic to trade in the EU now? And I'm not sure doubling up on warehousing in the UK and EU is traditionally seen as a benefit to the environment.
1andrew1 is online now   Reply With Quote