Re: BREXIT
 

Quote:

Originally Posted by tweetiepooh (Post 35888103) Common sense says that we want free movement and rights[

I may have misunderstood you; apologies if so, but free movement is wrong in any shape or form. Every nation should have controlled immigration. That helps a nation plan regarding job skills requirements and social resources. It also maintains each nations culture and unique identity.

---------- Post added at 13:43 ---------- Previous post was at 13:33 ----------


Spot on

Re: BREXIT
 

We're leaving the EU and the debate has moved on. Some want a return to WTO rules; this speech explains the drawbacks if this occurs.

Re: BREXIT
 

A mutually beneficial negotiated settlement will be reached imho.

Re: BREXIT
 

I hope so too.

Re: BREXIT
 

There will be no drawbacks that I see, it's more wild spreading fear and speculation.

It would be a massive drawback remaining in the failing project (EU).

Re: BREXIT
 

Again, I'm a little unsure as to why you wish to re-fight the "leaving EU battle" when that was settled back in June. :confused:

The article was about the downsides of leaving the EU and relying on WTO rules. Not about leaving or remaining in the EU.

Re: BREXIT
 

Not entering a 'leaving EU' debate, agree that has been done to death.

I am just saying the article you have linked to, is just speculation, fear spreading.

It's not working (with me anyway).

Re: BREXIT
 

Unfortunately it's us that will be the losers. The bill for leaving will be £50bn, and that's just for starters.
http://uk.businessinsider.com/brexit...6-12?r=DE&IR=T

Never mind we've loads of money spare and can always hit the poor, vulnerable and disabled again. Boris et al will be ok with their private healthcare etc. The already gigantic divisions in this country are going to massively increase.

Re: BREXIT
 

That isn't a bill for leaving the EU and it is extremely disingenuous to portray it as such.

That figure represents Michael Barnier's assessment of our financial liabilities, due to commitments we have already made. No honourable person would argue we shouldn't pay what we promised we would pay. HMG might, however, argue over the precise amount, if the details of the commitment are obscure. Either way, those financial commitments would continue indefinitely if we had remained in the EU, but will come to a definite end now we are leaving.

Re: BREXIT
 

Whatever the figure it's going to cost big time and effect us all (bar the very rich of course). Anyone who thinks otherwise is living in cloud Cuckoo land. Why else has every living PM, including the current one, campaigned for Remain?

Re: BREXIT
 

Personally, I think our Prime Ministers get too close to the subject, with all the sumitry that goes on. Modern EU heads of government are almost friends and colleagues. It is hardly surprising that they should all form the view that they are better off sticking together. Add to that the fact that it will undoubtedly be very tricky to unpick the web of treaties we have become entangled in and it is not hard to see why even a eurosceptic prime minister would decide it is best left alone - simply a fight not worth picking.

My principal reason for voting leave, however, was precisely because untangling ourselves has become so difficult and in not many more years it might have become truly impossible. All member states of the EU have de facto surrendered a degree of their sovereignty. That, to me, is not acceptable.

Anyway, the point is now moot. We're leaving. Art.50 will be invoked not more than 28 days from now.

Re: BREXIT
 

I think the UK will argue that it is owed a share of the EC real estate and this will make a good dent in the £50bn.

Re: BREXIT
 

Indeed I think with the net amount we've paid in over the years it can be argued that the EU actually owes US money.

Re: BREXIT
 

It is you that's living in cloud cuckoo land.

Re: BREXIT
 

Because they are a bunch of traitors who have bought into the EU plan.